Psychological barriers for take-up of health care benefits and child support benefits in the Netherlands

DOI

We empirically test an integral model for healthcare and child support benefits take-up using a probability sample of the Dutch population (N = 905). To examine how different psychological factors, in conjunction, explain take-up, we apply model averaging with Akaike’s Information Criterion (AICC). For both types of benefits, people’s perceptions of eligibility best explain take-up. For healthcare benefits, take-up also relates to perceptions of need. Exploratory analyses suggest that for healthcare benefits but not for child support benefits, executive functions, self-efficacy, fear of reclaims, financial stress, and welfare stigma explain perceived eligibility. We find no support for knowledge, support, and administrative burden as explanatory factors in take-up. We discuss the results in relation to the Capability Opportunity Motivation Behaviour (COM-B) model for developing behavioural change interventions.

The data are available upon request from Centerdata.

Identifier
DOI https://doi.org/10.34894/ZARRMT
Related Identifier IsCitedBy https://doi.org/10.1177/09589287231164343
Metadata Access https://dataverse.nl/oai?verb=GetRecord&metadataPrefix=oai_datacite&identifier=doi:10.34894/ZARRMT
Provenance
Creator Simonse, Olaf ORCID logo; Knoef, Marike ORCID logo; van Dillen, Lotte F. ORCID logo; van Dijk, Wilco W. ORCID logo; van Dijk, Eric ORCID logo
Publisher DataverseNL
Contributor Simonse, Olaf; van Dijk, Wilco W.; Data Stewards Behavioural Sciences
Publication Year 2023
Rights CC-BY-4.0; info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess; http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
OpenAccess true
Contact Simonse, Olaf (Leiden University); van Dijk, Wilco W. (Leiden University); Data Stewards Behavioural Sciences (Leiden University)
Representation
Resource Type Dataset
Format application/zip
Size 1179625; 98933; 17373; 146016; 762344
Version 1.0
Discipline Agriculture, Forestry, Horticulture, Aquaculture; Agriculture, Forestry, Horticulture, Aquaculture and Veterinary Medicine; Jurisprudence; Law; Life Sciences; Social Sciences; Social and Behavioural Sciences; Soil Sciences