Phytoplankton Metabarcoding vs Microscopy

Phytoplankton is used worldwide to monitor the environmental state of aquatic systems. Long-time series of microscopy-analyzed phytoplankton are available from many monitoring stations. The traditional microscopy method is however time-consuming and has shortcomings, such as the low resolution of certain taxa. Metabarcoding has been suggested as an alternative method, but the consistency between different methods needs illumination. We performed a comparative study of microscopy and DNA metabarcoding, by analyzing micro- and nanophytoplankton at 5 coastal sites in the northern Baltic Sea during an autumn sampling. The results are promising for implementing DNA metabarcoding as a complement to microscopy in phytoplankton monitoring, especially if group-level indexes can be applied to classify the environmental state of water bodies.

Identifier
Source https://data.blue-cloud.org/search-details?step=~012BE23C6B5A36E43E91389BCA974906A460BB8A88C
Metadata Access https://data.blue-cloud.org/api/collections/BE23C6B5A36E43E91389BCA974906A460BB8A88C
Provenance
Instrument Illumina MiSeq; ILLUMINA
Publisher Blue-Cloud Data Discovery & Access service; ELIXIR-ENA
Contributor Umea University
Publication Year 2024
OpenAccess true
Contact blue-cloud-support(at)maris.nl
Representation
Discipline Marine Science
Spatial Coverage (19.760W, 63.480S, 19.840E, 63.510N)
Temporal Point 2016-10-20T00:00:00Z