Figure 3 Comparison iR correction technique

Figure 3: Comparison of different iR-correction techniques for post-measurement processing of recorded ORR-activity data. A) Temperature evolution of the cell electrolyte during the polarization curve measurement when adding EIS and CI for post measurement determination of the iR drop. B) iR drop depending on the current density measured via EIS and CI. C) Overall polarization curves with different iR corrections. The red point shows a single point measurement, where EIS was carried out before and after the potential measurement and is used to give the standard deviation due to the temperature related change of iR drop during the measurement time of this single point. Measurements were carried out on GDEs with a Pt loading of 100 µg cm.2.

Identifier
Source https://tudatalib.ulb.tu-darmstadt.de/handle/tudatalib/3565
Metadata Access https://tudatalib.ulb.tu-darmstadt.de/oai/openairedata?verb=GetRecord&metadataPrefix=oai_datacite&identifier=oai:tudatalib.ulb.tu-darmstadt.de:tudatalib/3565
Provenance
Creator Schmitt, Nicolai; Schmidt, Mareike; Mueller, Jonathan E.; Schmidt, Lasse; Etzold, Bastian J.M.
Publisher TU Darmstadt
Contributor TU Darmstadt
Publication Year 2022
Rights Creative Commons Attribution 4.0; info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
OpenAccess true
Contact https://tudatalib.ulb.tu-darmstadt.de/page/contact
Representation
Resource Type Text
Format text/plain
Discipline Other