Eye Tracking the Use of a Collapsible Facets Panel in a Search Interface

DOI

Facets can provide an interesting functionality in digital libraries. However, while some research shows facets are important, other research found facets are only moderately used. Therefore, in this exploratory study we compare two search interfaces; one where the facets panel is always visible and one where the facets panel is hidden by default. Our main research question is “Is folding the facets panel in a digital library search interface beneficial to academic users?” By performing an eye tracking study with N=24, we measured search efficiency, distribution of attention and user satisfaction. We found no significant differences in the eye tracking data nor in usability feedback and conclude that collapsing facets is neither beneficial nor detrimental.This dataset contains the eye tracking data and user satisfaction data.

Identifier
DOI https://doi.org/10.17026/DANS-ZM9-ZPRB
Metadata Access https://ssh.datastations.nl/oai?verb=GetRecord&metadataPrefix=oai_datacite&identifier=doi:10.17026/DANS-ZM9-ZPRB
Provenance
Creator MJ Kemman; M. Kleppe; J. Maarseveen
Publisher DANS Data Station Social Sciences and Humanities
Contributor MJ Kemman
Publication Year 2013
Rights CC0-1.0; info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess; http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0
OpenAccess true
Contact MJ Kemman (Dialogic)
Representation
Resource Type Dataset
Format application/pdf; application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document; text/tab-separated-values; application/vnd.ms-excel.sheet.macroenabled.12; application/x-spss-syntax; application/octet-stream; application/zip
Size 106875; 17489; 418067; 26781; 135713; 748; 1242; 30265; 1445; 29691; 1478; 29273; 1291; 28629; 11405; 5206; 336614; 25365
Version 1.0
Discipline Humanities