Finnish Opinions on Security Policy and National Defence 2025

DOI

Maanpuolustustiedotuksen suunnittelukunnan (MTS) tutkimuksessa selvitettiin suomalaisten mielipiteitä ulko-, turvallisuus- ja puolustuspolitiikasta, maanpuolustuksesta, asevelvollisuudesta sekä Venäjän hyökkäyssodasta Ukrainaan. Mukana oli myös kysymyksiä turvallisuuteen ja turvallisuudentunteeseen vaikuttavista tekijöistä, turvallisuuden kehittymisestä seuraavan viiden vuoden aikana sekä eri tahojen vaikutuksesta Suomen turvallisuuteen. Vastaajilta kysyttiin lisäksi heille mahdollisesti huolta aiheuttavista tekijöistä, Euroopan unionin tulevaisuudesta, suhtautumisesta Suomen Nato-jäsenyyteen, Puolustusvoimien kyvystä torjua sotilaallisia uhkia, Ukrainan auttamisesta, sekä yhteiskunnan ja yksilön kriisinkestävyydestä. Taustamuuttujina olivat muiden muassa vastaajan sukupuoli, ikä, työelämään osallistuminen, ammatti/asema, koulutus, elämäntilanne, kotona asuvien lasten iät, perheen tuloluokka, ruokakunnan koko, asunnon tyyppi, aluemuuttujia sekä puoluekanta.

The annual Finnish Opinions on Security Policy National Defence survey charted Finnish public opinion on foreign policy, defence policy, security, military alliances, military service, and international armed conflicts at the time of the survey. Some questions examined views on factors affecting safety and security. This survey round also included questions about the Russian invasion of Ukraine. Opinions were charted on the success of foreign policy in the previous few years, funds allocated to the Defence Forces, whether Finland should resort to armed defence in case of any sort of attack, whether the respondents would be prepared to participate in national defence according to their abilities, and how the global security situation would develop in the next five years. Views were probed on the current, conscription-based defence system. Satisfaction with defence policy in the previous few years was also investigated. The respondents were asked to evaluate the impact of several countries and organisations, such as Russia, China, US, UN, NATO and EU, on Finland's security. Views on how the military situation in nearby regions would develop during the next decade were also examined. The respondents were asked whether their trust in the future of the European Union had weakened, strengthened or stayed the same. Additionally, the respondents' trust in the ability of the Finnish Defence Forces to defend Finland against military threats was examined. Views were probed on how diplomacy, EU defence cooperation, EU defence industrial collaboration, international crisis management, and Nordic defence cooperation contributed to Finland's security alongside NATO membership. Next, concerns caused by certain phenomena and issues were charted, such as withdrawals from arms controls agreements, climate change, various infectious diseases and epidemics, proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, organised crime, international terrorism, inflation, cyberthreats, development of artificial intelligence, political extremism, racism and current developments in Russia, the US, the Middle East and the Baltic Sea regions. On the topic of the Russian invasion of Ukraine, the respondents were asked whether the EU and its member states should continue to offer military and financial support to Ukraine and impose sanctions on Russia. The respondents were also asked whether other NATO states should be ready to defend Finland in case of an armed attack on Finland and whether Finland should be prepared to defend other NATO states in case of an armed attack on another NATO state. Finally, the respondents were asked about Finnish society's preparedness for crises, their own capacity to cope in such situations, and whether they believed the United States would defend Finland or other European countries under NATO obligations. Background variables included, among others, the respondent's gender, age, economic activity and occupational status, household composition, ages of children living at home, gross annual income of the household, level of education, region of residence and political party choice.

Ei-todennäköisyysotanta: kiintiöpoimintaNonprobability.Quota

Non-probability: QuotaNonprobability.Quota

Kasvokkainen haastattelu: tietokoneavusteinen (CAPI tai CAMI)Interview.FaceToFace.CAPIorCAMI

Itsetäytettävä lomake: verkkolomakeSelfAdministeredQuestionnaire.CAWI

Face-to-face interview: Computer-assisted (CAPI/CAMI)Interview.FaceToFace.CAPIorCAMI

Self-administered questionnaire: Web-based (CAWI)SelfAdministeredQuestionnaire.CAWI

Identifier
DOI https://doi.org/10.60686/t-fsd4066
Source https://urn.fi/urn:nbn:fi:fsd:T-FSD4066
Related Identifier https://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-951-663-348-3
Related Identifier https://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-951-663-380-3
Related Identifier https://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-951-663-316-2
Metadata Access https://datacatalogue.cessda.eu/oai-pmh/v0/oai?verb=GetRecord&metadataPrefix=oai_ddi25&identifier=ad5986a162535ce6938935c1cd33a823bfc538fc2136abc465f7d525f9b3a0d7
Provenance
Creator Maanpuolustustiedotuksen suunnittelukunta (MTS); Advisory Board for Defence Information (ABDI)
Publisher Yhteiskuntatieteellinen tietoarkisto; Finnish Social Science Data Archive
Publication Year 2026
Rights Yhteiskuntatieteellinen tietoarkisto; Finnish Social Science Data Archive; Tietoarkiston ja aineiston luovuttajan tekemän sopimuksen mukaisesti.; In accordance with the agreement between FSD and the depositor.; Aineisto on käytettävissä (B) tutkimukseen, opetukseen ja opiskeluun.; The dataset is (B) available for research, teaching and study.
OpenAccess true
Contact https://www.fsd.tuni.fi/
Representation
Resource Type Kvantitatiivinen; Quantitative
Discipline Agriculture, Forestry, Horticulture, Aquaculture; Agriculture, Forestry, Horticulture, Aquaculture and Veterinary Medicine; Life Sciences; Social Sciences; Social and Behavioural Sciences; Soil Sciences
Spatial Coverage Suomi; Finland; Suomi; Finland