Identifying the origin of false memories: A comparison of DRM and categorised lists.

DOI

There is disagreement between memory researchers over whether false memories are caused at encoding or at retrieval. This disagreement is compounded by the fact that different studies have used different experimental procedures to elicit false memories. Two widely used procedures are DRM and category repetition. In the DRM procedure, participants study words that are associates of a nonpresented word (or "critical lure"). For example, "bed", "dream", "pillow", and "snore" are all associates of the critical lure "sleep". When asked to remember the words, participants frequently claim to remember hearing the critical lures. In category repetition, participants study words from semantic categories (eg animals or occupations). When asked to remember the words, participants often falsely remember nonpresented members of the target categories.It has been suggested that the DRM effect is caused by associations made at encoding, whereas the category repetition effect is caused by associations made at retrieval. However, previous research by the PI suggests that the encoding stage is critical in both procedures. The aim of the proposed research is to investigate the effects of experimental manipulations that influence either encoding or retrieval processes. The effects of these manipulations on DRM and category repetition will be compared.

Computer based measures of memory accuracy

Identifier
DOI https://doi.org/10.5255/UKDA-SN-850078
Metadata Access https://datacatalogue.cessda.eu/oai-pmh/v0/oai?verb=GetRecord&metadataPrefix=oai_ddi25&identifier=b8e90cbd562f3c9c916756b7130f73eb12d6afda18d4513112c33a20edd0ccf3
Provenance
Creator Dewhurst, S, Lancaster University
Publisher UK Data Service
Publication Year 2009
Funding Reference Economic and Social Research Council
Rights Stephen Dewhurst, Lancaster University; The Data Collection is available for download to users registered with the UK Data Service.
OpenAccess true
Representation
Resource Type Numeric
Discipline Psychology; Social and Behavioural Sciences
Spatial Coverage United Kingdom