The purpose of the study Quality of life in Ljubljana was to find out the opinions and the views of residents of Ljubljana on satisfaction with housing, about spatial and environmental problems of the city, about the quality of management and tidiness of the city, about the operation of the municipal administration, about satisfaction with health care, about cultural and sports offer in the city, about traffic and other matters that affect the quality of their living and functioning in Ljubljana. The aim of the study was to multidimensional measure the subjective perception of the quality of living of the inhabitants of the City Municipality of Ljubljana. The research was conducted on a representative sample, and consequently the gathered data allow generalization of results for the entire population of Ljubljana, as well as the analysis of the quality of living of the subgroups of inhabitants.
About half of the realized interviews were made on the basis of simple random sampling. The sample was made by the Statistical Office of RS and included 1400 addresses of people living in Mestna občina Ljubljana = The City of Ljubljana. It had been distributed along the borders of 17 district communities, from which some of them were further divided into several separate parts, which led to 22 similarly large and 2 smaller spatial units. The other half of the realized interviews were carried out between random people of MOL within the individual district communities, because of poor realization of primary sample, a request for a statistically representative sample was not reached. In the selection of respondents, interviewers were committed to follow age and gender quotas, which were required by a representative list of respondents. Number of realized interviews was 1400.About half of the realized interviews were made on the basis of simple random sampling. The sample was made by the Statistical Office of RS and included 1400 addresses of people living in Mestna občina Ljubljana = The City of Ljubljana. It had been distributed along the borders of 17 district communities, from which some of them were further divided into several separate parts, which led to 22 similarly large and 2 smaller spatial units. The other half of the realized interviews were carried out between random people of MOL within the individual district communities, because of poor realization of primary sample, a request for a statistically representative sample was not reached. In the selection of respondents, interviewers were committed to follow age and gender quotas, which were required by a representative list of respondents. Number of realized interviews was 1400.
Face-to-face interview: PAPI.