Datasets for MONet: Heterogeneous Memory over Optical Network for Large-Scale Data Centre Resource Disaggregation

DOI

Fig. 4 MONet: Switch-Plane Characterization - Architecture Power and LatencySwitch Plane Characterization: Power and network latency comparison between Non-Parallel (fat tree) and MONet architecturesFig. 5: MONet: Remote memory access Round Trip LatencyDDR4/HMC local/remote (8m) memory read/write latency: 8-bonded transceivers each at 10,12.5, 15 Gb/sFig 6: MONet: DDR4/HMC Remote memory read/write latency overheadRemote memory read/write latency: Impact of optical distance b/w CPU and remote memory on round-trip latency. Values are measured experimentally for 8, 18 and 36m; only 100m is based on Eq1.Fig 7. MONet DDR4: Achieved Bandwidth, Memory/Link UtilizationMONet DDR4 Access: Achieved bandwidth, link and memory bandwidth utilization for locally and remotely (8m) attached DDR4: transceiver lanes at rates (10, 12.5 and 15 Gb/s)Fig 8. MONet HMC: Achieved Bandwidth, Memory/Link UtilizationAchieved bandwidth, link and memory bandwidth utilization for locally and remotely (8 m) attached HMC, compared with achieved maximum memory bandwidth for different lane rates (10, 12.5, 15 Gb/s)Fig. 9 MONet: Power Consumption DistributionPower consumption distribution between CPU and memory over 8-metre round-trip optical data path. Round-trip net energy efficiency (with and without MONet’s resources) and memory-to-link ratio over number of transceivers link and lane rate.Fig. 10: MONet HMC Access: Physical Layer PerformancePhysical layer performance of a single bi-directional channel CPU and HMC: Received optical power (dBm) vs log10(BER).Fig. 11: MONet HMC Access: BER vs BandwidthImpact of Bit Error Rate (BER) on memory bandwidth performance per one HMC half width link (8 transceivers).Fig. 12: MONet STREAM Benchmark DDR4STREAM benchmark performance for DDR4 at 8-metres round-trip distance using 8 and single channelFig. 13: MONet HMC STREAMS benchmarkApplication level performance using the STREAM benchmark for accessing serial memory (local and remote at 8 metres round-trip) at 10, 12.5 and 15 Gb/s lane rate.Fig. 14 MONet: DDR4 and HMC: STREAM and baselineSustained STREAM and baseline bandwidth (8-links) over round-trip over round-trip optical distance: 8, 18, 26,36 metres.Fig. 15-16: MONet DDR4: Memcached ThroughputAchieved Throughput in Workload (A, B, C and F) when DDR4 is locally/remotely attached. For DDR4: parallel accessed (MM), stream data-width size in bytes (8 to 64). Sustained Throughput in Workload (A, B, C and F)when DDR4 is remotely attached at round-trip optical distance 8, 16, 26 and 36-metres.Fig. 15-16: MONet HMC: Memcached ThroughputAchieved Throughput in Workload (A, B, C and F) when HMC is locally/remotely attached. For HMC: full-width (FW) (16-lane) and half-width (HW) (8-lane)at 10, 12.5 and 15 Gb/s bit-rates. Sustained Throughput in Workload (A, B, C and F) when HMC is remotely attached at round-trip optical distance 8, 16, 26 and 36-metres.Fig. 17-18 MONet: DDR4 Memcached LatencyAchieved Average Latency in Workload (A, B, C and F) when DDR4 is locally and remotely attached. For local attachment in DDR4: parallel accessed (MM), stream data-width size in bytes (8 to 64). Sustained Average Latency in Workload (A, B, C and F) when DDR4 is remotely attached at round-trip optical distance 8, 16, 26 and 36-metresFig. 17-18: MONet HMC Memcached LatencyAchieved Average Latency in Workload (A, B, C and F) when HMC is locally and remotely attached. For local attachment in HMC: Full-width (FW) (16-lane) and half-width (HW) (8-lane) at 10, 12.5 and 15 Gb/s bit-rates. Sustained Average Latency in Workload (A, B, C and F) when HMC is remotely attached at round-trip optical distance 8, 16, 26 and 36-metresFig. 19: MONet DDR4 Memcached IPCImpact of optical distance on IPC in workload (A,B, C and F) for whole CPU. For DDR4: using 8 and one transceivers links each at 10, 12.5 and 15 Gb/s.Fig. 19: MONet HMC Memcached IPCImpact of optical distance on IPC in workload (A,B, C and F) for whole CPU. For HMC: Half-width (8-lane) at 10, 12.5 and 15 Gb/s bit-rates

Identifier
DOI https://doi.org/10.5522/04/14339273.v1
Related Identifier https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/27361724
Related Identifier https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/27361727
Related Identifier https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/27361730
Related Identifier https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/27361733
Related Identifier https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/27361736
Related Identifier https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/27361739
Related Identifier https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/27361742
Related Identifier https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/27361745
Related Identifier https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/27361748
Related Identifier https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/27361751
Related Identifier https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/27361754
Related Identifier https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/27361757
Related Identifier https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/27361760
Related Identifier https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/27361766
Related Identifier https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/27361769
Related Identifier https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/27361772
Related Identifier https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/27361775
Metadata Access https://api.figshare.com/v2/oai?verb=GetRecord&metadataPrefix=oai_datacite&identifier=oai:figshare.com:article/14339273
Provenance
Creator Benjamin, Joshua; Mishra, Vaibhawa; Zervas, Georgios
Publisher University College London UCL
Contributor Figshare
Publication Year 2021
Rights https://opensource.org/licenses/MIT
OpenAccess true
Contact researchdatarepository(at)ucl.ac.uk
Representation
Language English
Resource Type Dataset
Discipline Construction Engineering and Architecture; Engineering; Engineering Sciences