Public demand for the rule of law in Hungary and the Czech Republic

DOI

This is a a representative empirical study where, instead of rating the importance of specific elements of the rule of law, respondents were asked to set up an order of priority between elements of democracy (majority rule) and the rule of law (counter-majoritarian institutions). The survey was conducted both in Hungary and the Czech Republic: these two countries represent the two extremes within the Visegrád Group regarding the rule-of-law-situation, Hungary being the worst and Czechia the best. In Hungary we can observe a deep tension in terms of priorities, and this basically translates into the government-opposition division: pro-government voters prioritise majoritarian arguments, while most opposition voters prefer counter-majoritarian institutions. In Czechia, on the contrary, counter-majoritarian and majoritarian features of the democratic system are seen in a more balanced way: even voters of populist and far-right parties highly appreciate the prevention of power abuse and a functioning constitutional court.

Dates of data collection: CZ: 7-18 August, 2024; HU: 2-12 July, 2024

Identifier
DOI https://doi.org/10.14473/csda/hl0xsa
Metadata Access https://api.datacite.org/dois/10.14473/csda/hl0xsa
Provenance
Creator Bakó, Beáta
Publisher CSDA
Contributor Charles University; Czech Social Science Data Archive; ČSDA; 21 Research Centre, Hungary
Publication Year 2025
Funding Reference MSCA Fellowships CZ – UK2: No. CZ.02.01.01/00/22_010/0008115
OpenAccess true
Representation
Resource Type Dataset; Survey data
Format application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document; text/tab-separated-values
Size 35179; 140004; 31671; 102576
Version 1.1
Discipline Social Sciences
Spatial Coverage Czech Republic; Hungary; Czech republic; Hungary