103 datasets found

The EPD (http://www.europeanpollendatabase.net) accepted species name is given in the parameter comment. This dataset was archived on 2010-05-11 from the EPD database.

The EPD (http://www.europeanpollendatabase.net) accepted species name is given in the parameter comment. This dataset was archived on 2010-05-11 from the EPD database.

The EPD (http://www.europeanpollendatabase.net) accepted species name is given in the parameter comment. This dataset was archived on 2010-05-11 from the EPD database.

The EPD (http://www.europeanpollendatabase.net) accepted species name is given in the parameter comment. This dataset was archived on 2010-05-11 from the EPD database.

The EPD (http://www.europeanpollendatabase.net) accepted species name is given in the parameter comment. This dataset was archived on 2010-05-11 from the EPD database.

Age determination: doi:10.1594/PANGAEA.740080The EPD (http://www.europeanpollendatabase.net) accepted species name is given in the parameter comment. This dataset was archived...

Ground vegetation cover analysis was done in summer 2018. Tree seedlings with a height less than 1.3 m were included.

Raw reads from samples of danish species, sequenced with the purpose of assembling mito genomes for future references.

Vegetation surveys were carried out in Northwest Territories, Yukon and British Columbia in Canada. The study area is within the boreal forest biome and is partially underlain...

Vegetation surveys were carried out in Northwest Territories, Yukon and British Columbia in Canada. The study area is within the boreal forest biome and is partially underlain...

Traditionally managed mountain grasslands are declining as a result of abandonment or intensification of management. Based on a common chronosequence approach we investigated...

Shrubs and trees are expected to expand in the sub-Arctic due to global warming. Our study was conducted in Abisko, sub-arctic Sweden. We recorded the change in coverage of...

Percentage values were calculated from Braun-Blanquet classes. r = <1 %, + = <5 %, 1 = 5 %, 2 = 15 %, 3 = 37.5 %, 4 = 62.5 %, 5 = 87.5 %

Percentage values were calculated from Braun-Blanquet classes. r = <1 %, + = <5 %, 1 = 5 %, 2 = 15 %, 3 = 37.5 %, 4 = 62.5 %, 5 = 87.5 %

Percentage values were calculated from Braun-Blanquet classes. r = <1 %, + = <5 %, 1 = 5 %, 2 = 15 %, 3 = 37.5 %, 4 = 62.5 %, 5 = 87.5 %

Percentage values were calculated from Braun-Blanquet classes. r = <1 %, + = <5 %, 1 = 5 %, 2 = 15 %, 3 = 37.5 %, 4 = 62.5 %, 5 = 87.5 %

Percentage values were calculated from Braun-Blanquet classes. r = <1 %, + = <5 %, 1 = 5 %, 2 = 15 %, 3 = 37.5 %, 4 = 62.5 %, 5 = 87.5 %

Percentage values were calculated from Braun-Blanquet classes. r = <1 %, + = <5 %, 1 = 5 %, 2 = 15 %, 3 = 37.5 %, 4 = 62.5 %, 5 = 87.5 %

Percentage values were calculated from Braun-Blanquet classes. r = <1 %, + = <5 %, 1 = 5 %, 2 = 15 %, 3 = 37.5 %, 4 = 62.5 %, 5 = 87.5 %

Percentage values were calculated from Braun-Blanquet classes. r = <1 %, + = <5 %, 1 = 5 %, 2 = 15 %, 3 = 37.5 %, 4 = 62.5 %, 5 = 87.5 %