-
Microplankton abundance at Station MARCH-1998-GN36199804611MNB04 in the eupho...
Microplankton species composition analysis was performed according to the inverted microscope method of Utermoehl. Samples for identification and enumeration of larger... -
Microplankton abundance at Station MARCH-1998-GN36199804611MNB03 in the eupho...
Microplankton species composition analysis was performed according to the inverted microscope method of Utermoehl. Samples for identification and enumeration of larger... -
Microplankton abundance at Station MARCH-1998-GN36199804611MNB02 in the eupho...
Microplankton species composition analysis was performed according to the inverted microscope method of Utermoehl. Samples for identification and enumeration of larger... -
Microplankton abundance at Station MARCH-1998-GN36199804611MNB01 in the eupho...
Microplankton species composition analysis was performed according to the inverted microscope method of Utermoehl. Samples for identification and enumeration of larger... -
Microplankton abundance at Station MARCH-1998-GN36199804610MSB03 in the eupho...
Microplankton species composition analysis was performed according to the inverted microscope method of Utermoehl. Samples for identification and enumeration of larger... -
Microplankton abundance at Station MARCH-1998-GN36199804610MSB01 in the eupho...
Microplankton species composition analysis was performed according to the inverted microscope method of Utermoehl. Samples for identification and enumeration of larger... -
Phytoplankton abundance in surface water in May 1996, Pisco, Peru
N=none, R=rare, F=few, C= common, A=abundance -
Phytoplankton abundance at stations off Punta Falsa in August 1995, Piura, Peru
This dataset has no description
-
Phytoplankton abundance at station Rigel_5_2005-05 in May 2005, Chipana, Chile
This dataset has no description
-
Diatom abundance of Hole 86-580
Relative abundance: D = dominant, A = abundant, C = common, F = few, R = rare, T = trace, P = present (numerical values are abundance in percent) -
Diatom abundance of Hole 86-579A
Relative abundance: D = dominant, A = abundant, C = common, F = few, R = rare, T = trace, P = present (numerical values are abundance in percent) -
Diatom abundance of Hole 86-579
Relative abundance: D = dominant, A = abundant, C = common, F = few, R = rare, T = trace, P = present (numerical values are abundance in percent) -
Diatom abundance of Hole 86-578
Relative abundance: D = dominant, A = abundant, C = common, F = few, R = rare, T = trace, P = present (numerical values are abundance in percent) -
Diatom abundance of Hole 86-577
Relative abundance: D = dominant, A = abundant, C = common, F = few, R = rare, T = trace, P = present (numerical values are abundance in percent) -
Microfossil abundance of Hole 16-158
Relative abundance: D = dominant, A = abundant, C = common, F = few, R = rare, T = trace, P = present (numerical values are abundance in percent) -
Microfossil abundance of Hole 16-157A
Relative abundance: D = dominant, A = abundant, C = common, F = few, R = rare, T = trace, P = present (numerical values are abundance in percent) -
Microfossil abundance of Hole 16-157
Relative abundance: D = dominant, A = abundant, C = common, F = few, R = rare, T = trace, P = present (numerical values are abundance in percent) -
Diatom counts of sediment core MD01-2421
Each sample was counted until a census of 200 was reached (see reference). -
Surface data of the Peru-Chile Current, relative abundance of diatoms
Based on 76 surface sediment samples collected between ca. 22° and 44°S along the Chilean coast in the southeast Pacific Ocean, we report on the north-south distribution of opal... -
Phytoplankton abundance at station Rigel_3_2005-03 in March 2005, Chipana, Chile
This dataset has no description
