Argumentative structure of scientific abstracts

In order to explore the possibility of leveraging discourse information for the identiffication of argumentative components and relations we add a new annotation layer to a subset of the Discourse Dependency TreeBank for Scientiffic Abstracts (SciDTB). [1]

We introduce a ffine-grained annotation schema aimed at capturing information that accounts for the specifficities of the scientiffic discourse, including the type of evidence that is offered to support a statement (e.g., background information, experimental data or interpretation of results).

[1] Yang, A., Li, S.: SciDTB: Discourse dependency TreeBank for scientiffc abstracts. In: Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL 2018) (Volume 2: Short Papers). pp. 444{449. Association for Computational Linguistics, Melbourne, Australia (Jul 2018)

Identifier
DOI https://doi.org/10.17632/gfcyx5s2tr.2
PID https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:nl:ui:13-n2-2gp1
Metadata Access https://easy.dans.knaw.nl/oai?verb=GetRecord&metadataPrefix=oai_datacite&identifier=oai:easy.dans.knaw.nl:easy-dataset:180085
Provenance
Creator Accuosto, P
Publisher Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS)
Contributor Pablo Accuosto
Publication Year 2020
Rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess; License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0; http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
OpenAccess true
Representation
Resource Type Dataset
Discipline Other