The purpose of share option grants is to align the interests of managers with those of shareholders. However, share option compensation may encourage opportunistic managerial behaviour aimed at maximising the value of their share options. Managers may artificially decrease share prices at the grant date which tends to be the value at which the exercise price is set. This study will examine whether the following four methods of depressing share prices are prevalent in the UK: Retrospectively choosing the date on which the option is granted (backdating); Pushing forward (delaying) the release of bad (good) news; Timing the option grant to occur before (after) the release of good (bad) news; and Using impression management to dampen good news and enhance bad news. Backdating is suggested if the option grant date coincides with market lows significantly more often than would randomly be expected. The existence of significantly negative abnormal returns around grant dates suggests that managers either opportunistically time bad news disclosures (scheduled awards) to coincide with grant dates or time grant dates (unscheduled awards) with bad news disclosures. Finally, significantly higher proportions of unfavourable and pessimistic disclosures may imply managerial impression management.
The data comprises 741 events with accompanying data. The variables are as follows: Company name, DS code, dates between grant date and announcement date, grant date, exercise price, number of shares granted, total salary, % option forms of total remuneration, whether the grant is classified as scheduled, market value, industry code, % of positive and negative words both before and after the grant, volatility of returns, actual, expected and abnormal returns from -170 days prior to the grant to 30 days following.