Evaluation of the amendment of the indecency legislation 1994 Evaluatie zedelijkheidswetgeving 1994

DOI

In this survey an inventory has been made of the consequences and results of the amendment of the indecency legislation, which was effected in 1991. P1219A - Jurists: section of criminal justice where respondent is working and his-her function / having experience with indecency offences: number of years/ frequency / knowledge of amendment of the indecency articles of the criminal code/ sources of information / judgement of: the information about the amendment/ the amendment itself in general / influence of the amendment on: criminal investigation and prosecution/ preparedness to report indecency offences/ chance on prosecution of reported offences/ chance on punishing the offenders / punishment has become more severe since amendment / new legislation is manageable and supplies an adequate and better protection / detailed questions about the changed formulation of the articles concerning indecency legislation and the resulting number of reports, criminal investigations and prosecutions / introduction of the right of complaint for the 12-16 year old / not reporting indecency offences: most important reasons/ influence of social workers on reporting / when the police is informed about an indecency offence and this will not result in a report: main reasons / a better cooperation between social workers and the police could increase the number of reports / decisive facts in the report for the application of the amount police efforts spend on criminal investigation / decisive circumstances for prosecution / practical aspects of: right of complaints/ prosecution/ trial / other influences on the field of indecency legislation: reorganization of police/ the incest affaire in the Dutch town Epe / undesired side-effects of amendment / necessary: another amendment/ additional policy. P1219B - Social workers: position of item "sexual abuse" in respondents function / intake procedure, use of client registration system / types of sexual abuse where respondent was confronted with in 1993 / organizations which were informed about cases of ( former ) sexual abuse in 1993 / policy of informing and-or reporting / most important reason of victim for not informing the police / report of sexual abuse in all occurring cases / judgement of loss of the specialized police unit for children and indecency / a better cooperation with the police would increase number of reports / judgement of: the information about the amendment/ the amendment itself in general / influence of the amendment on: criminal investigation and prosecution/ preparedness to report indecency offences/ chance on prosecution of reported offences/ chance on punishing the offenders / detailed questions about right of complaints / adequate protection against sexual abuse in general is supplied / undesired side-effects of amendment / necessary: another amendment/ additional policy. Background variables: basic characteristics/ place of work

Identifier
DOI http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.17026/dans-x5u-trwq
Metadata Access https://easy.dans.knaw.nl/oai?verb=GetRecord&metadataPrefix=oai_datacite&identifier=oai:easy.dans.knaw.nl:easy-dataset:33020
Provenance
Creator Savornin-Lohman, J. de, Beijers, W.M.E.H., Gelder, C.P. van, Goderie, M.J.H., Nieborg, S.M.A., Rijkschroeff, R.A.L., Dr. Hilda Verweij-Jonker Instituut * Utrecht (primary investigator)
Publisher Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS)
Contributor Verwey-Jonker Instituut * Utrecht (data collector) ;Prof.Dr. J.C.J. Bontelier, H. Verwey Jonker Instituut (depositor);Ministerie van justitie, CDWO * Den Haag (research initiator)
Publication Year 1995
Rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Contact Verwey-Jonker Instituut * Utrecht (data collector) ;Prof.Dr. J.C.J. Bontelier, H. Verwey Jonker Instituut (depositor);Ministerie van justitie, CDWO * Den Haag (research initiator)
Representation
Resource Type Dataset
Discipline Not stated
Temporal Point 1995-01-01T11:59:59Z