Validating the Dutch SF-6D and EQ-5D Using Pairwise Comparisons and Best-Worst Scaling

In April 2011, the LISS panel completed two questionnaires about the valuation of health. The questionnaires serve to validate the Dutch SF-6D and EQ-5D (classifications for describing health) and to understand the valuation of health in the Netherlands.

For this purpose, the SF-6D questionnaire uses discrete choice experiments (pairwise comparisons). The EQ-5D is a shorter and simpler instrument than the SF-6D. Therefore, the EQ-5D questionnaire also examines the best way of posing the questions. For this purpose, pairwise comparisons and best-worst scaling are used (the evaluation of three health states simultaneously).

Identifier
DOI https://doi.org/10.17026/dans-zmb-2ec5
PID https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:nl:ui:13-l0a9-6s
Metadata Access https://easy.dans.knaw.nl/oai?verb=GetRecord&metadataPrefix=oai_datacite&identifier=oai:easy.dans.knaw.nl:easy-dataset:49435
Provenance
Creator CentERdata - Institute for data collection and research - Tilburg University
Publisher Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS)
Publication Year 2012
Rights info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess; DANS License; https://dans.knaw.nl/en/about/organisation-and-policy/legal-information/DANSLicence.pdf
OpenAccess false
Representation
Language English
Resource Type Dataset
Format SPSS; STATA; PDF
Discipline Agriculture, Forestry, Horticulture, Aquaculture; Agriculture, Forestry, Horticulture, Aquaculture and Veterinary Medicine; Life Sciences; Medicine; Social Sciences; Social and Behavioural Sciences; Soil Sciences
Spatial Coverage The Netherlands